Uncovering the interconnectedness of help, strains in social relationships, and the ripple effects of suicidality in Archie’s Final Project (2009) and Butter (2022)

At the beginning of her presentation, yours truly at the podium!

Research shows that, among U.S. youth films, few movies portray the repercussions of suicidality in any nuanced way. Only 24% of films refer to and expose some kind of ripple effects of suicide. The portrayal of help—either offering it, seeking it, or getting it—is even rarer. Of the few such films, Archie’s Final Project (2009) and Butter (2022) stand out for several reasons. Although almost 15 years apart, the two films, both independent, show similarities in the cinematic tropes and narrative structure they utilize, and the overall message they convey. Examined with a sociological lens, both films shed light on fundamental experiences youth go through the alienation and sense of disconnect that many high school students feel; sexual attraction and first loves; destructive behavior, such as bullying; and social media use and misuse. The films simultaneously tease out the relationships, either successful or strained, that these kids weave with other people, be they parents, teachers, physicians or therapists, and peers, whether friends or foes. The strains in all these social relationships can expand our understanding of how suicidality arises and plays out. Critically, by focusing on these relationships we can also isolate and understand the repercussions of suicidality on the suicidal individual himself, and other people.

This paper was one of five in a session with the giants in the field: Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Steven Stack, Mark Sinyor, and Rachel Mitchell.

From right to left: Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, Mark Sinyor, Steven Stack, Barbara Bowman, and Rachel Mitchell

Talking about suicide through film

Getting ready to present at the 2024 Society for the Study of Social Problems conference!
Firing up the presentation!

Suicide can be considered a form of violence: violence against the self (Seggi, 2022; Kandel Englander, 2012). By becoming the second leading cause of death among young people, it has turned into a public health crisis (AACAP, 2018; AFSP, n.d.; Drapeau & McIntosh, 2020; Rahhal, 2019; Vanorman & Jarosz, 2016; Vanorman & NCIPC, 2019; Wan, 2019)

Hence, it is not far-fetched to think that any number of students in our classrooms might have been affected by suicide and suicidal behavior, either as survivors or bereaved. Yet, because of their close proximity to suicidality, and the still widespread stigma attached to it, students might be understandably reluctant and uncomfortable to directly discuss suicidality in the classroom. They might nevertheless become exposed to numerous instances of suicidality in the media and social media (13 Reasons Why (2017), Mare of Eastown (2021), and Butter (2022), to name a few), all the while possibly feeling unequipped to grasp them.

In light of all this, studying films with instances of suicidality in the classroom can provide the much-needed buffer that allows people to gain enough distance from suicide and suicidal behavior to actually talk about it. A well thought-out media literacy strategy can empower students vis-à-vis these films, while opening up for them the wider social context for suicidality (Seggi). The set of questions that make up such media literacy strategy are posed from the perspective of a young person watching these films. They are divided into four parts: Questions about the young audience vis-à-vis the films; questions about the portrayal of suicide in these films; questions around issues of authenticity in the cinematic portrayal of suicide and issues of marketability; questions around how the young audience can become a media maker.

AACAP. (2018, June). Suicide in children and teens. Retrieved May 14, 2020, from https://www.aacap.org/AACAP/Families_and_Youth/Facts_for_Families/ FFF-Guide/Teen-Suicide-010.aspx

AFSP. (n.d.). Speaking out about suicide. https://www.datocms-assets.com12810/ 1588002792-13739afspspeakingoutaboutsuicideflyerm1.pdf


Drapeau, C. W., & McIntosh, J. L. (2020). U.S.A. suicide: 2018 official final data. American Association of Suicidology. https://suicidology.org/wp-content/ uploads/2020/02/2018datapgsv2_Final.pdf

Kandel Englander, E. (2012). Understanding violence. Psychology Press.

Rahhal, D. (2019, October 17). Alarming report reveals suicide rates have risen 56% in a decade among young Americans. Daily Mail. Retrieved October 19, 2019, from https://www.dailymail.co.uk/health/article-7584529/Alarming- report-reveals-youth-suicide-risen-56-past-decade.html

Seggi, A. (2022). Youth and suicide in American cinema: context, causes, and consequences. Palgrave Macmillan.

Vanorman, A., & Jarosz, B. (2016). Suicide replaces homicide as second-leading cause of death among U.S. teenagers. Population Reference Bureau. https:// www.prb.org/resources/suicide-replaces-homicide-as-second-leading-cause- of-death-among-u-s-teenagers/

Wan, W. (2019, October 17). Teen suicides are increasing at an alarming pace, outstripping all other age groups, a new report says; The disturbing trend worries researchers who have struggled to understand its causes. Washington Post Blogs. https://www.washingtonpost.com/health/teen-suicides-increasing-at- alarming-pace-outstripping-all-other-age-groups/2019/10/16/e24194c6- f04a-11e9-8693-f487e46784aa_story.html


Youth and suicide in American cinema: Silence and its repercussions

This presentation analyzes the portion of cinematic portrayals of suicide that illustrates the repercussions of silence.

Yours truly introducing the topic of her presentation at the 2024 Society for the Study of Social Problems conference (yet again!)

The Papageno effect: With help comes hope; and with both comes growth

Part of a session with giants in the field such as Steven Stack, Mark Sinyor, Thomas Niederkrotenthaler, and Rachael Mitchell, my presentation further develops a portion of a large multidisciplinary study, which mapped the portrayal of suicidality in US youth films both qualitatively and quantitatively, from the early 20th century till 2019 (N = 186). In particular, in light of recent research conclusions that point to how media portrayals of help seeking, hope and recovery may possibly exemplify the protective effect of media—the Papageno effect—I analyze the narrow extent and the nevertheless compelling manner in which help seeking on the part of suicidal individual is depicted in youth films from both a media effects and media literacy perspectives. First, I discuss the few understated yet persuasive depictions of help seeking in youth films. Beyond the Lights (2014), It’s Kind of a Funny Story (2010), and nominally Charlie Bartlett (2007) underscore how help—offering it, seeking it, and getting it—can be challenging, yet essential to one’s recovery and growth. Second, I offer examples of media literacy strategies that young
audiences can use to internalize the importance of seeking help when in a crisis.

You can watch the entirety of the session below!

Tune in to my presentation at 28′ 41″

Bang bang, you’re (socially) dead

Yours truly during her presentation at the Popular Culture Association conference

The film Bang Bang You’re Dead indirectly discusses critically important social processes around youth suicidality. Directed by Guy Ferland and released in the early 2000s, when school shootings definitively rose to prominence in American society, this film offers us a chance to reflect on several facets of relationality: suicidal behavior as well as social death, bullying, depression, and social conformity. In turn, fascinating yet insidious social mechanisms such as the self-fulfilling prophecy, the role of both by-standers and helping witnesses, and the healing power of art come to the fore. They all show us how as individuals we are inevitably shaped by social groups (both those we might abhor and those we might strive to belong to), no matter how independent or isolated we think we are. All in all, Bang Bang You’re Dead offers an unvarnished look into critical social issues that have become all the more pressing since the film’s release.


Youth and suicide in American cinema

Shaun Vigil, Editor, Temple University Press, served as moderator for a panel discussion about my book Youth and suicide in American cinema: context, causes and consequences. The scholars who served as panelists are as follows:

Mary Chayko, Communication, Rutgers University

Susan Mackey-Kallis, Communication, Villanova University 

Diana Papademas, SUNY Old Westbury 

Julia Sonnevend, Sociology & Communication, The New School for Social Research

Author Meets Critics panel – From left to right: yours truly, Shaun Vigil, Diana Papademas, Mary Chayko, Susan Mackey-Kallis, and Julia Sonnevend

Read more about the Author Meets Critics panels here!


Recurrent life themes

Ale Seggi introducing her talk at the 2023 Popular Culture Association conference, in San Antonio, TX

Sample films about youth and suicide (from the 1900s to the 2010s) highlight recurrent life themes that, while stemming from the suicidal behavior itself, stretch well beyond it. Relationality emerges as constitutive of social life. Silence hides complicity, when not voicing our concerns when we have some, or not speaking up in front of injustice, or not seeking help when in a crisis. It also demonstrates how we become complicit in perpetuating injustice, how we might aggravate our condition, or how we might perpetuate a life in suicidal mode, as well as perpetuating the path of least resistance. Death, loss, bereavement, and grief distinctively embody the human condition. Violence imbues virtually every aspect of social relations. Suicide emerges as only one form of violence amidst many.

Suicidality emerges as a symptom of wider issues related to adolescent experiences: the anxious sense of in-between-ness; the compounded anxiety of youth who are marginalized because of one or multiple aspects of their identity, whether sex, gender, sexuality, race, ethnicity or origin; the range of violence youth experience in their lives directly, and via media and technology; the overall success- and happiness-oriented discourses and cultural practices that dictate silent self- reliance and toughness as signs of normalized masculinity. This masculinity is both hegemonic and toxic; it uses violence while in search of identity (Rebel without a Cause, A Clockwork Orange, and Pups) or while abusing power (as in Something Wild, Full Metal Jacket, and Trust).

Ale Seggi presenting at the 2023 Popular Culture Association conference, in San Antonio, TX

Browse the 2023 PCA conference program here!


Strains in social relationships

Like in life, understanding the repercussions of a suicide in a film is a way of understanding suicide itself. Yet, films infrequently discuss the physical and emotional consequences of suicidal behavior on the suicidal individual. My research findings (from a sample of 187 films with youth and suicide, selected from the 1900s to the 2010s) show how cursorily the suicidal character’s suffering is usually treated—the more action packed the film is, the less the character’s suffering is addressed. The suffering of the bereaved and the suicidal individual is one of the consequences of suicide that most films neglect to address. When films tackle the ripple effects of suicide, they tend to highlight the emotional consequences on the bereaved, but not the suicidal individual.

In connection to their overall messages about youth and suicide, the sample films also bring up several instances of strain in social relationships that expand our understanding of what they say about suicide in society. The first tension expresses divergent views about the consequences of suicidality for the suicidal individual; all other forms of strain focus on the reactions—feelings, thoughts, and actions or inaction—of the bereaved. By poring over them, we can learn a great deal about suicidal behavior.